Illinois State Senator Julie Morrison talks confiscation of firearms “for safety”

We’ve heard it all before. It’s not “gun control”, it’s “gun safety” or “gun sense”. That’s total BS, as it’s just a rebranding of the term to make it sound nice. Heck, Bloomberg’s Moms even admitted to it 2 months after they formed:

https://momsdemandaction.org/group-is-fighting-for-gun-control-but-dropping-use-of-the-term/

What’s in a name? A lot, if your name includes the term “gun control.” So in a nod to the political realities of the moment, a group founded in the days after the Newtown, Conn., school shooting is officially changing its name by dropping the politically loaded term.

Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America is the new name for an organization formerly known as One Million Moms for Gun Control, the group’s founder will announce Wednesday. The change was prompted by confusion with another group, One Million Moms, which advocates for family-friendly entertainment media — and because the group’s old name includes the term “gun control.”

“We’ve gotten a lot of feedback from stakeholders that ‘gun control’ isn’t the best term to use because it can be polarizing,” the group’s founder, Shannon Watts, said in an interview Tuesday. “We don’t want to be polarizing – we want to be a nonpartisan organization. We’re not about overturning the Second Amendment or banning guns, but we also don’t believe that we should arm every citizen.”

Watts, a former public relations executive, said the feedback came from “the legislative community, from other people in advocacy organization and from our own members, from moms who are conservative or NRA members who said to us, this term ‘gun control’ is polarizing, we need to come up with a better name so it makes it seem like we can all sit under the same umbrella.”

So now that we got that out of the way (gun safety/gun sense=gun control), let’s discuss what happened last night (6/11/19) in Deerfield, Illinois at a town hall event with State Senator Julie Morrison.

Morrison is the driving force between many anti-2nd amendment bills that have been introduced in the senate. She despises gun owners and firearms all together. She was the main sponsor for SB107, which is an “assault weapon” ban which would stop further sales and require current owners of so-called “assault weapons” to register them with the state police and pay a fee (pretty much a tax) in order to keep them. If you fail to do so, congratulations! You just became a felon (and lose your 2nd amendment rights all together).

http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/fulltext.asp?DocName=&SessionId=108&GA=101&DocTypeId=SB&DocNum=107&GAID=15&LegID=115114&SpecSess=&Session=

As most 2A supporters will tell you, registration leads to confiscation. The anti-gun activists and politicians say it doesn’t. They say “no one wants your guns”. Well, thanks to Senator Morrison last night, we know that’s not true. Please watch the following exchange:

(Click the link, it’s only a minute long)

You heard it. Clear as day. She got mad at a legitimate question she was asked and out of spite, said “screw it! I’ll just take the damn things” (confiscation). What’s even more shocking is that her Moms Demand Action supporters applauded the statement, further cementing that they themselves are not looking for “responsible gun safety laws”, but are looking for firearms to be taken by force (if necessary) from law abiding citizens.

Make no mistake, folks. These politicians are not interested in the legality of such actions or protecting your constitutional right to bear arms. They want your guns and they will gladly turn you into a felon at the stroke of a pen. They will also gladly send people with guns to your home in order to force you to hand over your guns. If you resist, you get arrested or even shot and killed. These legislators and their activist allies are enemies of the constitution and they make that clear. They hide behind fancy terms which deceive the uneducated. This (below) was the reaction of one Moms Demand Action member when Morrison suggested confiscation. She looked back at the 2A crowd and had a glowing smile on her face.

She must think the thought of law enforcement kicking down the door of a family, with their firearms at the ready and prepared to kill, is a funny way to force owners of legally owned semi-automatic rifles and handguns to surrender their property or die. This is not a joke, but our opponents seem to think it is. They don’t care about our safety or well being and would breath a sigh of relief if a few of us were incarcerated or even killed in the confiscation process.

Keep up the fight, and never surrender your firearms.

2 thoughts on “Illinois State Senator Julie Morrison talks confiscation of firearms “for safety”

  1. So tired of these people. Dont they understand anything about how criminals work ? They dont care one bit about what laws they create for lawful citizens. Please keep exposing these morons.

    Like

  2. Australian Gun Law Update –
    Here’s a thought to warm some of your hearts….
    From: Ed Chenel, A police officer in Australia
    Hi Yanks, I thought you all would like to see the real figures from Down Under. It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by a new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by our own
    government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars.
    The first year results are now in:
    Australia-wide, homicides are up 6.2 percent,
    Australia-wide, assaults are up 9.6 percent;
    Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent)!
    In the state of Victoria…..alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent.(Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not and criminals still possess their guns!)
    While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady
    decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months, since the criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is unarmed.There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the elderly, while the resident is at home.
    Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort and expense was expended in ‘successfully ridding Australian society of guns….’
    You won’t see this on the American evening news or hear your governor or members of the State Assembly disseminating this information.
    The Australian experience speaks for itself. Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws affect only the law-abiding citizens.
    Take note Americans, before it’s too late!
    FORWARD TO EVERYONE ON YOUR EMAIL LIST.??
    DON’T BE A MEMBER OF THE SILENT MAJORITY.
    BE ONE OF THE VOCAL MINORITY WHO WON ‘T STAND FOR NONSENSE
    AUSTRALIA: MORE VIOLENT CRIME DESPITE GUN BAN!!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s